Management of basal cell carcinoma with pulmonary metastasis
- Samuel Achilles Fordham 1,
- Emily Ximin Shao 2,
- Leith Banney 1,
- Mary Azer 3 and
- Andrew Dettrick 4 , 5
- 1 Dermatology, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, Queensland, Australia
- 2 Dermatology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
- 3 Oncology, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia
- 4 Sunshine Coast University Hospital, University of Sunshine Coast, Birtinya, Queensland, Australia
- 5 Pathology, Melanoma Institute Australia, Wollstonecraft, New South Wales, Australia
- Correspondence to Dr Samuel Achilles Fordham; sfordham2020@gmail.com
Abstract
A man in his 50s presented with an ulcerative lesion within the left axillary fold that had progressively worsened over 18 months. Biopsy revealed an ulcerative basal cell carcinoma (BCC), which was surgically managed. CT chest scans done 7 months later assessed post-treatment of radiotherapy. This revealed pulmonary lesions, which were biopsy-proven metastatic BCC. Sonidegib, a hedgehog signalling inhibitor, was used for first-line treatment. Due to progressive disease, sonidegib was ceased. Cemiplimab, a checkpoint inhibitor, was used as second-line treatment based on a phase II trial demonstrating efficacy in the setting of metastatic BCC. CT reports were initially consistent with response but after 6 months of cemiplimab treatment, repeat CT chest scans revealed a decrease in size of the previously cited pulmonary lesions.
This is a rare case of BCC metastases which has limited treatment options. This case provides insight of the patient experience on such treatment.
Background
Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is a non-melanocytic skin cancer characterised by uncontrolled proliferation from the basal layer of the epidermis and its surrounding appendages. Most cases are locally invasive and do not behave aggressively. However, although exceptionally rare, metastatic variations also occur.1
Annual incidence of BCC in Australia was approximately 770 per 100 000 from 2011 to 2014 with a low association with morbidity and mortality, although this is thought to be underestimated as non-melanocytic cancers are not included in the cancer registry.2 Furthermore, metastatic BCC has an approximate incidence of 0.0028%–0.5% with a significant association with morbidity and mortality.3
BCC is generally managed with surgical excision, radiotherapy, curettage, photodynamic therapy or topical treatments including imiquimod.4 Metastatic cases require a multidisciplinary approach to management. Management of metastatic or advanced BCC include extensive surgical resections, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and more recently, immunotherapy.
This is a case of an undiagnosed BCC that had locally invaded surrounding tissue which progressed to pulmonary metastases over the course of several months. This was initially treated with sonidegib, a hedgehog signalling pathway inhibitor (HPI), before changing to Cemiplimab, a programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor (PD-1). This case reports the use of PD-1 inhibitors to treat advanced or metastatic BCC.
Case presentation
A previously fit and well man in his 50s was referred to the plastic and reconstruction surgeons with a 10×5 cm non-healing ulcer that was deeply fixed within the left axilla (figure 1). The ulcer had been present for 18 months and was treated with several courses of antibiotics and closures with no successful resolution. Biopsy and CT scans of the thorax revealed an ulcerating BCC with muscle, arterial and venous involvement. This necessitated surgical excision and postoperative radiotherapy. Biopsy-proven pulmonary metastatic BCC 7 months later prompted treatment with sonidegib. Further disease progression 14 months later was managed with cemiplimab.
An ulcerated lesion in the left axillary fold measuring 10×5 cm at time of initial referral.
A previous left shoulder BCC was previously excised. Pathology reports are unavailable.
On examination, there was no cervical or axillary lymphadenopathy, while a neurological examination found normal power and strength with some paraesthesia over the medial aspect of the left forearm.
Investigations
Punch biopsy of the left axillary lesion confirmed a BCC without an associated in situ component. Following this, a neck and chest CT scan revealed a 27×18 mm subcutaneous left axillary ulcer lateral to the left pectoralis major muscle. At the base of the ulcer, a 30×17 mm mass extended to the left axillary artery (figure 2). A left arm CT angiogram revealed a left axillary BCC that extended to the left subscapular artery and left axillary vein.
CT scan of the thorax demonstrating a 30×17 mm subcutaneous ulcer within the left axillary fold. It extends laterally to the left pectoralis major muscle.
Histopathology of the resection specimens demonstrated a BCC with perineural invasion, vascular invasion and 1/8 lymph nodes being involved (figure 3A–D). A tumour, nodes and metastases (TNM) status of pT3pN1pM0 was given at this time. This demonstrated that the primary tumour was more than 40 mm in maximum dimension and there was local metastasis in a single ipsilateral lymph node that was less than 30 mm. There was no cited distant metastatic disease.
The skin/axillary lesion showing an area of conventional BCC which merged into more poorly differentiated tumour elsewhere. (A) Low power view (H&E original magnification ×100). (B) High power view (H&E original magnification ×400). (C) BerEP4 (original magnification ×400). (D) Epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) staining used in identifying carcinomas (original magnification ×400). BCC, basal cell carcinoma.
A CT chest scan 7 months postoperatively demonstrated pulmonary nodules bilaterally. CT-guided lung biopsy confirmed metastatic BCC with pulmonary involvement, with tissue consisting of basaloid cells surrounded by a peripheral palisade of neoplastic cells (figure 4A–F). The TNM status was upgraded to pT3pN1pM1 with new evidence of distant metastatic disease. Any presence of metastatic disease automatically denotes the status of disease as a stage IVB BCC.
Core biopsy of the lung lesion showing a basaloid epithelial tumour with very similar morphology and matching immunohistochemical profile. (A) Medium power view (H&E original magnification ×200). (B) High power view (H&E original magnification ×400). (C) BerEP4 (original magnification ×400). (D) Bcl2 (original magnification ×400). (E) CEA (original magnification ×400). (F) EMA staining used in identifying carcinomas (original magnification ×400).
Differential diagnoses were considered, such as squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Macroscopically BCC generally has a pink, pearly and nodular appearance that is associated with telangiectasias, rolled borders and central ulceration. SCC typically have plaque-like appearances that are nodular before becoming ulcerated with everted edges and an appearance that resembles granulation tissue. On pathology, BCC may be represented by discrete nesting of basaloid cells within the dermis with ulceration showing discontinuous epithelium.5 Peripheral palisading may also be seen. In contrast, SCC may show atypical basaloid cells with features of nuclear palisading and cellular apoptosis.5 Keratin pearls (hyperkeratosis), intraepithelial bridges and tumour nesting may also be seen with SCC.5
A repeat CT chest scan was performed 15 months later which revealed mild increase of size in pulmonary nodules. In particular, a 16 mm nodule was noted in the left major fissure, a 15 mm nodule was noted in the anterior segment of the right upper lobe and a 16 mm nodule was noted in the medial basal segment of the left lower lobe (figure 5A).
(A) CT chest image taken several months into the treatment of Sonidegib. It demonstrates a pulmonary nodule that is 16 mm within the left major fissure. This was previously 12 mm on the initial CT chest scan. (B) A serial CT chest scan that is taken 6 months into the treatment of cemiplimab demonstrating a decrease in size of the pulmonary nodule that has decreased in size to 6 mm.
After commencing cemiplimab, a reduction in cited nodules was noted 6 months into treatment. The nodule in the left major fissure reduced to 6 mm, the nodule in the anterior segment of the right upper lobe reduced to 6 mm and the nodule in the medial basal segment of the left lower lobe had resolution (figure 5B).
Differential diagnosis
Treatment
Multidisciplinary team discussions concluded that a multidisciplinary approach was required. Surgical management would have input by general, vascular and plastic surgery. Postoperative management would require input from dermatology and oncology for regular skin checks and radiation therapy.
The plastic and reconstructive surgical team performed an excision of the left axillary fold with an axillary lymph node dissection. The axillary fold was surgically reconstructed with a serratus perforator flap (figure 6A,B).
(A, B) The postoperative result after excising the left axillary lesion and reconstruction with a serratus perforator flap.
Nerve and tendon transfers were performed 2 months later following brachial plexopathy of the left upper limb secondary to the excision. Nerve transfer included the extensor carpi radialis brevis to the anterior interosseous nerve and supinator branches to the flexor carpi radialis. Tendon transfer included the extensor indicis muscle to the extensor pollicis longus tendon.
Occupational therapy for the left hand commenced after the tendon and nerve transfer. Intrinsic muscles were non-functional, which were managed with compression garments and exercises promoting wrist extension with passive digit flexion. Rehabilitation has been ongoing, and the most recent review demonstrated ongoing improvements in motor function of intrinsic muscles.
Postoperative radiation therapy was commenced 3 months postoperatively at a dose of 63 Gy in 30 fractions to the site of positive margins and 60 Gy in 30 fractions to the rest of the operative bed. Radiotherapy was completed in 5 weeks after 30 treatments.
When BCC pulmonary metastases were confirmed, it was decided that sonidegib treatment was appropriate. An application was successfully appointed by oncology. Surgical excision was considered but was ultimately negated as there was no perceived benefit if Sonidegib was to be commenced.
Over the next 14 months, sonidegib (200 mg) was taken once daily as a capsule at night, at least 1 hour before or after food to minimise gastrointestinal side effects. It was initially tolerated well. The patient, however, developed episodes of parageusia that self-resolved, along with facial alopecia. Five months into treatment, the patient developed intermittent muscle cramps. After a year, the patient had ageusia and worsening muscle cramps. When bloods revealed an elevated creatine kinase (CK) level of 795 units/L, it was decided that sonidegib was to cease until CK levels returned to baseline. Muscle cramps resolved with cessation. Fourteen months after the initial CT chest scan and treatment with sonidegib, there was progressive disease with mild increase in size of the pulmonary nodules.
Due to progressive disease, it was decided that cemiplimab was to be used instead via compassionate access. This was because cemiplimab is currently not available on the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. A recent phase 2 trial analysed cemiplimab in those with locally advanced BCC (laBCC) after HPI therapy, which exhibited significant antitumour activity and an adequate safety profile.6 It is important to note that the patient himself was not part of a clinical trial during the time of treatment.
Baseline bloods were completed before commencement of cemiplimab. Serial bloods are done every 3 weeks. Cemiplimab (350 mg) is taken once as an intravenous infusion with sodium chloride 0.9% (50 mL) over a 30 min cycle in the day unit investigation therapy facility. A registered nurse administers the infusion after the infusion is confirmed by the treating doctor. Nine cycles in total were done every 3 weeks over a 6-month period. After 6 months of treatment with cemiplimab, the patient had no adverse effects. A CT chest scan at the end of the 6-month treatment period revealed a decrease in size of several nodules. Due to its clinical effectiveness, it was decided that a further seven cycles were to be done.
Outcome and follow-up
He is continuing to attend dermatology and oncology reviews for regular skin checks and ongoing management of metastatic BCC.
The patient is to continue cemiplimab. The patient has responded to treatment and is continuing to work with no limiting factors, such as dyspnoea or fatigue. Serial radiological scans will continue to evaluate metastatic staging.
Discussion
Metastatic BCC is a tumour that originates from a primary BCC that spreads to distant sites through lymphatic or haematogenous pathways. Dissemination most often occurs to surrounding lymph nodes (60%) while haematogenous spread to lungs (42%), bone (20%) or skin (10%) are closely followed.7 Associated symptoms and signs include anaemia, fatigue, lymphadenopathy, bone pain and myalgia. While symptoms may indicate the potential for metastasis, the median time interval between tumour onset and clinical signs is 9 years.7 The incidence of metastatic BCC is extremely rare, with 25 total cases being cited in literature from 2012 to 2017.8 The ratio of male to female incidence is thought to be 4:1 while the median age of onset of the primary tumour is 65 years.8
Risk factors for metastatic BCC include prolonged duration, site of the primary tumour (greater risk with tumours from the neck above), tumour size (greater than 3 cm), number of lesions, invasion depth, previous BCC, recurrent BCC, refractory to standard treatment, infiltrative histological pattern, residual tumour after surgical resection and previous radiation exposure.9 In this case, the BCC was left untreated for over a year with a significant history of previous BCC. Refractory initial treatment with antibiotics is an indication for biopsy, which was prolonged for over year that ultimately led to metastatic BCC.
The location of metastasis and extent of dissemination can influence approach to treatment. General measures include wide surgical excision for local metastasis or an adjuvant therapy with chemotherapy and radiotherapy for more distant metastasis.9
Dysregulated hedgehog signalling pathways have been identified in the pathogenic process of BCC by causing unregulated cellular growth from defected proteins.10 One such protein is the smoothened transmembrane protein, which regulates downstream transcription of cellular division.10
Since 2012, HPIs have been opted for those who do not respond to surgical or radiotherapy interventions.11 However, most literature reviews cite a high rate of low tolerability.11 Vismodegib, a HPI, was evaluated in a phase 2 clinical trial (ERIVANCE trial), which demonstrated long-term safety and efficacy in patients with metastatic and laBCC.12 The BCC outcomes with LDE225 (Sonidegib) treatment (BOLT) trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of sonidegib.13 The final 42 months of analysis demonstrated response rates of 56% in laBCC and 8% in metastatic BCC with an overall conclusion of sonidegib being a viable long-term treatment for advanced BCC. Sonidegib is approved by the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods.14 Indications for approval include patients with laBCC that are not amenable to curative surgery and radiation therapy or patients with metastatic BCC.14
Cemiplimab, a checkpoint inhibitor, has recently been approved by the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration. Compassionate access as a monotherapy-based treatment for metastatic and laBCC may be used in cases where past treatment with a HPI was not appropriate.15 Cases where curative surgery or curative radiation are not appropriate are also indicated.15 The PD-1 receptor is expressed on antigen-stimulated T cells that help to mediate the immune system.16 However, when PD-1 binds to its following ligands, ligand 1 and 2, it causes mass inhibition of downstream signalling that would normally result in an immune response of T cell proliferation and cytokine release.16 Thus, such tumours can be undetected by the immune system. PD-1 inhibitors, therefore, regulate the immune system by reducing tumour growth.
Historically, cemiplimab has been an option for advanced melanoma and cutaneous SCC. Previously, there was no second-line alternative to sonidegib, however, the recent approval of cemiplimab in advanced and metastatic BCC may offer patients a more favourable side effect profile while prolonging mortality. Due to limited case reports and literature outlining the treatment of cemiplimab for metastatic BCC, our case may provide insight on its potential effectiveness for future reference.
There is a paucity of guidelines in treating metastatic BCC due to its exceptionally rare occurrence. Although surgical resections with postsurgical radiotherapy have been the historical management, newly developed antineoplastic agents may provide better outcomes. The case highlights that checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic BCC may result in better clinical outcomes with less adverse effects and longer mortality.
Patient’s perspective
‘Initially, I was quite upset that the general practitioners (GPs) and the skin specialist hadn't picked it up. The first three GPs that I saw said it was a hair follicle infection. Then I saw a skin specialist because I had a feeling it might have been a BCC after having one similar prior on the back. He just said, no, it’s an infection and I saw him for several months. After that, I thought now I've got to find someone who is going to do more work on this. So that’s when I chased up another doctor and she referred me to the hospital. I was sort of at peace once I saw the hospital and they confirmed what it was and were happy to proceed and try and tackle it the best they could. It was quite a challenging process in the beginning.
The whole experience with the hospital has been amazing. All the doctors that were involved and the nursing staff had done everything they could. The doctors got me straight in to get the nerve transfer. After losing two of the nerves to the hand, the ulnar and median nerve, he got me the straight down there for surgery and involved physiotherapy to try and get some pinch action. After physiotherapy and surgery, I achieved more than what doctors had ever expected, so that was good. Then just to have another cancer pop up, it was great to see that the doctors scratched their heads and put me in and did some CT scans to do some more investigative work. Without them, I would have just come home and a couple of years later would have been scratching my head as to why I can't breathe, with the cancer on the lungs.
I'm very grateful of the whole journey through the hospital staff for what they've done. The drug they first put me on the, the hedgehog inhibitor, had side effects that knocked the living daylights out of me, mainly through muscle cramps and muscle spasms. That was quite unbearable towards the end and they actually got me to stop taking the drug momentarily to try and get my muscle enzymes back down to a satisfactory level. Once the cancer started to increase in size again, I was quite happy to drop that drug and go on to this new drug that they've got me on, cemiplimab. It’s been a challenge, but you keep your head up and battle on.
I had no side effects with the new medication. I stopped taking the hedgehog inhibitor and the old side effects started to wear off. Since then, I've just felt my body is getting stronger every day. I'm doing more things than what I've ever done in the last few years and no longer suffering any side effects of cramps or spasms. I’ve been able to start building the body strength back up. I'm actually starting to grow hair back again on the body because I'd lost all the hair with the hedgehog inhibitor. Now I'm getting a little bit of fluff growing on the chin and the arms as well as getting some eyebrows and eyelashes again. It’s been an excellent drug for me.
The doctors have been excellent. When I started the new drug or whenever I've been on a drug, they continually call just to make sure I'm doing okay. They've kept regular contact whether it be through over the phone or going into online Zoom calls. The whole experience has been very good, can’t fault it whatsoever.
The medical teams have provided me a whole list of different support contacts if I needed it. I'm sort of pretty independent and headstrong. I've got some mates at work that I chat to and family that have been very supportive. I haven't needed to outsource any extra support.
Overall, it’s been a wild type of experience. It’s been one hell of a ride but I'm glad where I am now. I just got the results after being on the new drug today and the results are showing a significant reduction in size of the lesions. The largest one was 16 mm and that’s down to 6 mm now. It’s been excellent, I walked out of that hospital today feeling like King Kong and it’s just been an excellent drug to be on. It had side effects that they were all concerned about, but I haven't really had anything, but it’s made me feel like Superman. It’s been a long time coming and I'm glad it’s finally getting to that stage now where it’s looking so positive.
I just wish there were more GPs around that took the time to actually talk to the patients and look into the issues as much as what the staff up at the hospitals have done. If the young staff that I'm seeing at the hospital are going to be future GPs, I've got very high hopes in our medical team in the future. Everyone’s been excellent, supportive and very investigative into this whole experience, seeing that it’s not a very common thing that will happen.’
This case was not the subject of complaint or litigation.
Learning points
-
This case highlights a rare case of undiagnosed basal cell carcinoma (BCC), which led to pulmonary metastasis. Undiagnosed BCC has the potential to progress to metastatic disease if untreated.
-
Significant history of previous skin cancers, as seen in this case, should opt healthcare practitioners to consider as such when managing skin lesions. Skin lesions that do not respond to treatment should be considered for biopsy.
-
Different therapeutic regimens were used throughout. Although surgical resection helped to eliminate the primary tumour, further management was needed for treating metastatic disease.
-
Hedgehog signalling pathway inhibitors may offer benefit to metastatic disease but have an unfavourable side effect profile. Checkpoint inhibitors may offer better tolerability. The use of cemiplimab demonstrated a decrease in metastatic pulmonary nodule size over a 6-month period.
-
Due to this being an exceptionally rare case, there is limited literature to guide therapeutic management. Future cases may provide insight on how to clinically manage metastatic BCC to provide better clinical outcomes for patients.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Associate Professor Andrew Dettrick, Dr Daniel Mathieson, Dr Alexandra Walton and the Sunshine Coast University Hospital Pathology Department for providing the histological images of the skin and lung basal cell carcinoma specimens.
Footnotes
-
Contributors All authors who are cited within the case report have contributed to the management and progress of the patient’s journey. SAF was responsible for the write up of the manuscript and collating all medical records and documentation. Submission of the manuscript was also done by SAF. All revised changes during the drafting process were completed by SAF. EXS was responsible for obtaining patient consent for the case report and documentation while making appropriate editorial changes within the manuscript. EXS also reviewed the manuscript. LB made appropriate suggestions to the editorial changes during the drafting process of the manuscript. LB also reviewed the manuscript. MA provided necessary medical documentation for the case report while making editorial changes throughout the drafting process. MA also reviewed the manuscript. The addition of Associate Professor Andrew Dettrick in the case report is attributed to the work he has contributed to the manuscript. This includes sourcing the histological specimens with text commentary, revision of the manuscript with additional comments on basal cell carcinoma pathology, construction of the data in a way that is accessible to readers and recommendations regarding the interpretation of histological specimens.
-
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
-
Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.
-
Competing interests None declared.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
- © BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
References
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer